investigative journalism

People Power: 84 Volunteers Led To Improvements In Houston's Air Quality

jteischeid@yahoo.com's picture
jteischeid@yahoo.com

Crowdsourcing environmental coverage

John Eischeid interviews Dina Cappiello from the Houston Chronicle

Dina Cappiello is an environmental reporter for the Houston Chronicle who harnessed the power of crowds to gather information for a series of articles. Eighty-four trained volunteer monitors helped Cappiello measure local air toxins for an investigative series that ran in the newspaper.

Dina's toxic air series

John Eischeid: Why did you choose to implement this type of reporting?

Dina Cappiello: Because the information I needed to answer my question wasn't out there. The Houston Chronicle had to collect it for itself.

5/21/07

More on Investigative Journalism: IRE's Brant Houston

To most of us, the journalism world looks to be in a state of more or less permanent upheaval (and not the good kind, generally speaking). But Brant Houston, the executive director of Investigative Reporters and Editors, has a more tempered view. While not sanguine about the staff and budget cuts roiling newspapers and TV news, he notes that those are only parts of the much broader canvas of “the media.”

The day I spoke with him about the state of reporting, open sourcing and other issues, he was talking to a conference of New America Media, a national group for ethnic news organizations founded by Pacific News Service. “I’m seeing an incredible amount of passion and incredibly well-sourced people in communities where there is deep concern over injustice,” he said. “I’m worried about the TV networks and newspapers, but at the same time I’m seeing tremendous growth in smaller community newspapers. They’re ready to go. They want to know more investigative techniques. They want to get networked. They want to know where documents are. So it’s hard to talk about one big storm cloud coming across the horizon.” His excerpted remarks follow.

Still, there’s no denying storm clouds are hovering over important segments of the media. Really, we’ve got thunder, lightning, hail and tornadoes. How is investigative journalism holding up?

At least twice a year I get asked, “is investigative journalism dying or dead?” The executive director of IRE has traditionally been asked that, as far as I know, since the `80s.


Sunlight Foundation's Bill Allison - How Can the Internet Be Harnessed for Investigative Journalism?

Ink is giving way to nodes and networks, ledes and inverted pyramids are being swallowed up by a tsunami of blogs and memes. Amid the din and aggressive edge of the digital conversation, how do we figure out what’s really going on in the world? The aim of NewAssignment.net is to harmonize these worlds, do a mashup of the best of each. On the one hand, there’s traditional shoe-leather reporting, where you call people up, assemble data and information, extract insights and ultimately a storyline that says something interesting. Though oft-derided these days, this is a craft, and done well it can have a tremendous impact – on individual lives and the political process. On the other hand, you have the digital world, where distance is obliterated (reducing, in some ways, the wear and tear on shoe leather), distinctions between “journalists” and “everyone else” are blurred, any curious citizen can post insights and ideas, and the pool of available digital data is growing exponentially.

So far, few people have managed to skillfully straddle these worlds; Bill Allison of the Sunlight Foundation is one of them. He worked at the Philadelphia Inquirer, where he was a researcher for investigative reporters Donald Barlett and James Steele; afterward, he spent nearly a decade at the Center for Public Integrity. At Sunlight, he has placed himself at the emerging nexus of citizen journalism and national politics, specifically Congress. Since starting at Sunlight last year, he has had a run of interesting stories and projects that capture something of how journalism will look like in the future – and, while it looks quite different, the fundamentals are the same.

He broke the story of $207 million in earmarks that Dennis Hastert obtained for a highway called the Prairie Parkway – a project that would spur development on land Hastert holds a stake in. Teaming up with bloggers and readers, Allison and his Sunlight colleagues helped out two Senators who’d put an anonymous “hold” on a bill requiring the government to create a searchable database of government contracts. (Not surprisingly, the two were champion pork appropriators Robert Byrd and Ted Stevens.) He has run several projects that utilize citizen journalists – or, more commonly, curious readers with a little extra time on their hands – to gather information on Congress.

I sat down recently with Allison to get his insights on the Internet and reporting, social networking, data and other topics – his remarks are excerpted below.

Bill Allison: I certainly don’t think that we’re at a point yet where the Internet could do something like the series you did on what was going to happen to New Orleans. They certainly can’t do a Barlett and Steele type investigation. There’s things the Internet isn’t capable of doing yet. There are bloggers who have expertise in a certain area who will write about their area of expertise, but that’s the opinion of one expert…this is just one person’s experience, and journalism is trying to put together, the joke is, two people’s experiences.


Charles Lewis on the Future of Investigative Journalism on the Web

Can in-depth journalism survive the changes now engulfing newspapers, TV and other “old media” – the demands of Wall Street, the public’s fragmenting attention in a world of expanding digital choices, the media’s own flat-footedness in dealing with all this flux? And how can you harness that flux by using the unique properties of the Internet – wired social networks, digital technologies, do-it-yourself reporting and blogging – to do in-depth journalism, as we’re trying to do with NewAssignment.net? I sat down recently and chatted about those questions with Charles Lewis, the founder and longtime director of the Center for Public Integrity, one of the nation’s premier independent, non-profit journalism organizations. Lewis left CPI in 2004 and is now Journalist in Residence at American University in Washington, D.C. – one among several hats that he wears. I excerpt his remarks below.

Lewis has been studying large-scale trends in the journalism industry – audience, readership, the future. To him (as to many of us) the current journalism landscape is a mixture of the appalling, the unknown, and the tantalizing – so much that our conversation induced a case of whiplash. At one point, he was describing the present moment as “a very, very deeply worrying time.” A few minutes later, he was saying, “I see this is as an absolutely, beyond words, thrilling time.”

NewAssignment has a particular interest in Chuck Lewis because he’s a pioneer in the nonprofit journalism model, and doing ambitious investigative journalism that touches people’s daily lives. He also thinks – as we’re hoping – that readers can dig up a lot of interesting stuff. During the 1990s, for instance, CPI put out a how-to book titled Citizen Muckraking. On a related project, Lewis and his colleagues became fascinated by the intense interest and involvement of people – some individually, some as members of local environmental groups – battling polluting industries near their homes.

We noticed that the first seeds of interest by ordinary folks who noticed their neighbors dying of cancer and they started asking questions, going to meetings and talking to public officials, are the exact same first things that journalists do. … Based on my limited experience I am pretty certain that there’s an immense world out there that is waiting to speak and has an incredible amount of knowledge.

But first, back to the appalling.


Top Pro Thinks Pro-Am Reporting Has Promise: Q & A with John McQuaid

Jay Rosen's picture

This is John McQuaid. And this: Path of Destruction, a book about what Hurricane Katrina did to the Gulf and why. In 1997 he won, with "Path" co-author Mark Schleifstein, the Pulitzer Prize for Public Service, the highest award in the craft of enterprise reporting. It was for Oceans of Trouble, a series on the decline of global fisheries. Washing Away is also McQuaid. That's the famous 2002 series for the Times-Picayune on Hurricane preparations (again with Mark Schleifstein.) It predicted the floods and failures of 2005.

John McQuaidMcQuaid is a proven craftsman in a demanding form: explaining a big, complicated story that is hidden from normal view. In this two-part Q & A, (the rest is tomorrow) he explains how it became impossible for him to remain at the Times-Picayune and continue to practice his craft. "My investigative job was eliminated, and I was told that the focus was on everybody pulling his or her weight to put out the daily paper."

But he left the newspaper world with a new ambition: "Find a way to do investigative and explanatory journalism via the web." This in turn led him to NewAssignment.Net. It's part of his determination to re-invent himself, after newspapers. Our interview is about this series of events.

As a contributing editor, McQuaid will be writing for the New Assignment site and researching possible pro-am projects as he takes his own crash course in networked journalism on the open Web.

Jay Rosen: When you contacted me about contributing to NewAssignment.Net you mentioned that you were "looking at the ways that the kind of in-depth journalism I have specialized in can migrate to the web." Tell me what brought you to that point. And why, as a reporter, have you recently grown so interested in the Web?


Syndicate content