AZ News

Too Little and Far Too Late for Tenet

Sean Richardson's picture

Watching George Tenet pitching his new book At The Center Of The Storm on 60 Minutes was a nauseating experience.  Not being content with having failed to prevent the 9/11 attacks or to capture or kill Osama Bin Laden and his top deputies prior to 9/11, Tenet now insists that he never really believed in the case for going to war with Iraq and was bullied by Cheney et al. 

In a letter to Tenet signed by six former CIA officers, he is rightly exorciated for attempting to burnish his reputation and to cash in on his failures.  Calling him "a grotesque mixture of incompetence and sycophancy shielded by a genial personality", the former CIA officers charge that "By your silence you helped build the case for war. You betrayed the CIA officers who collected the intelligence that made it clear that Saddam did not pose an imminent threat. You betrayed the analysts who tried to withstand the pressure applied by Cheney and Rumsfeld. Most importantly and tragically, you failed to meet your obligations to the people of the United States. Instead of resigning in protest, when it could have made a difference in the public debate, you remained silent and allowed the Bush Administration to cite your participation in these deliberations to justify their decision to go to war. Your silence contributed to the willingness of the public to support the disastrous war in Iraq, which has killed more than 3300 Americans and hundreds of thousands of Iraqis."

Where was this man's sense of duty to the American people?  At least Colin Powell, although equally culpable for making the case for the Iraq War, was asking hard questions of Tenet.  Powell insisted that Tenet sit behind him as he made the case for invading Iraq to the U.N. and Tenet did so.  More than any other single piece of evidence or speech made by any American official, including President Bush's infamous State of the Union address, the American people knew and trusted Colin Powell, who quite obviously realizes that he sold his soul in a misplaced sense of duty to the Commander in Chief leftover from his service in the Pentagon. 

Unlike Powell, who was obviously shut out of day to day foreign policy making despite having the title of Secretary of State, Tenet spoke to Bush every morning about the threats to American security.  While both men should have resigned in protest rather than enable Bush's war, only Tenet could have exerted strong back channel pressure in Congress with his briefings to the intelligence committees.  Had he raised any doubt in private about the intelligence that Congress was spoon fed by the neocon's, we may very well have avoided one of the worst foreign policy and military debacles in our history.


Site Changes -- 98 percent Done!!!! What's Going On? Read Below

David Cohn's picture
in

Isn't it exciting building an open source platform out of nothing?

We've re-thought the Assignment Desk to show the entire story on one page. That was pretty cool.

Then we took a good long hard look at our front page and asked "what is this page for?"

To give you the latest news in the site. True. But with the topic home pages, one for every subject we are covering, that's where the changes will be really happening.

Every topic has (or will soon) an editor. That's where the action is. We don't want to keep you on the "scoop" more than we have to (and we know you don't want to be there -- you want to get going on a topic).

So we've combined the assignment desk and the scoop into one page. It's a tight squeeze and it isn't as pretty, we know. But the old newsroom is still around. You can always visit it here. Note the nifty url...hehe. And we think this view is much more functional.

Of course -- this is everyone's site. If we get massive protest we will change it back. But before you leave a hateful comment -- think about functionality. From one page you can get the latest blog posts from the scoop -- and jump right into the story. If you want to see the editors blogroll -- go to the About page -- and visit "The Team" page. The same information is on the site -- and the most important information is now all on the front page -- info from the scoop -- and the evolving story itself. Me and Amanda will be cleaning up the other pages over the next 24 hours. I'll also be tweaking our new Assignment Desk -- which is directly underneath the latest blog post on the front page -- hot dog.

Note: as of writing this the "Assignment Desk" is still in the navigation. It will remain there until our AMAZING developers forward the existing links out there back to the home page --- only then will it be safe to dismantle that navigation bar.

The goal is to create teams. So go to a topic (the list is right below the latest blog post on the homepage) and join a team. Editors are standing by.

Much Love
David
aka: Digidave


News About Assignment Zero's Next Phase-- And Some of its People

by Jay Rosen

Assignment Zero launched on March 14. Evan Hansen and I consulted at the four-week mark and determined that the project should run about seven more weeks but that we couldn't wait until everything was done to show some initial results. So here's what we decided to do, as explained by Evan in this letter to Assignment Zero participants. For contributors, there's news in it about getting published and about a new role for AZ editor Lauren Sandler.

It's been a month since the launch of Assignment Zero, and it's amazing to see how much has been accomplished so far.

As editor-in-chief of Wired News, and a co-founding member and editorial advisor on AZ, I'm thrilled with the results to date.

We've got some 900 participants and 40 or so topic pages that will soon have dedicated editors. We've already produced a new and improved version of the AZ platform, incorporating insights based on the experience of running an open source journalism site.

The last leg of this collaboration is approaching. We have a strong site and a big enough community; distributed research is starting to come in. Now we need to take this raw material and turn it into something. Clearly, the final results are still wide open.

Given the breadth of our efforts so far, and the work yet to be done, Jay and I sat down in the past week to discuss what we need as a group to cross the last mile. And it occurred to us that one thing that might help everyone would be to have a concrete example of what we're doing: a completed piece of writing.

It's one thing to generate raw material. But what is all of this going to look like as a finished work of journalism? We don't really know at this point. And that could be a problem as 40 separate topics lurch to completion all at once.

In my role as editorial advisor, I suggested it might be useful to know what's required to take AZ reporting and publish it on pro news web site like Wired.com.

Jay agreed.

If we were to fork the project at this point, and select some small piece of it for a "first wave" or trial run to completion, we could discover a lot about what we had. And that could help the rest of the group as we shift gears from the hunting and gathering phase to the writing and editing itself.

We came up with a plan to execute exactly this: a publishable article, based on AZ reporting, completed with the help of the AZ community, to appear on Wired.com by the end of the month.

To continue reading, please visit Jay's blog entry.


Red Alert: Time to Hone in on the Story

David Cohn with the evening post and a RED ALERT

Some people have been asking "what will the final product look like?"

Good question. Why donate your time to something if you don't see the bigger picture? In the grander scheme we are helping to produce a work of journalism in a new fashion. The final piece will be written by Jeff Howe and it will be published on Wired News, which has also agreed to publish any contributor stories that meet its editorial standards. But don't take my word for it, here's Jeff Howe's take on how the final story will look.

RED ALERT

Last Friday we talked about pruning the list of topics. That time has come. If you have last minute protests -- let us know, send David Cohn a note.

Why cut down? We've extended our arms through the Crowdsourced world and we have a general sense in what interests you. This is our story and we are following your lead. The goal of Assignment Zero isn't to be an all encompassing compendium of crowdsourcing. We could do that on Wikipedia if we wanted. The goal is to write a collaborative trend story. We've done our basic research and editors are in place to help. So it's time to reign in the topics and really get down the examples of crowdsourcing we want to pursue.


What the Editors are Saying

David Cohn here with a quick wrap-up of editorial concerns and questions

Updates from the editors and our different topics:

Michele McLellan says the crowdsourced novels topic is really shaping up: "The new site design feels transformative. In the last couple of days it has facilitated a great discussion on the Crowdsourced Novels team."

Jeff Sykes, working on the SellaBand story asks "What should we ask the creators of SellaBand?" They just had a great interview with a band that used SellaBand, now they are going after the creators!

John Abell is currently editing five topics and has a challenge for the AZ team: "You're assignment, should you choose to accept it, is to pitch an angle none of the geniuses here have thought of.

Call it the ultimate crowdsource challenge: what are we missing?

Think up a sidebar, timeline, profile, scene-setter or whatever that tells a part of the story you don't think is getting the attention it deserves.
Your reward: first dibs on doing the piece and a place in crowdsourcing journalism history."

And if you have last minute questions for Eric von Hippel, make sure to share them with Leonard Witt, who is doing an interview tomorrow.

And that's what's going down. So make yourself known -- find a topic and join a team, together we can report this story out to its fullest.


New and Improved Assignment Zero

After a long night of work, David Cohn posted early this morning that the new topic pages are up. You can see an example of one here.

What's new? Each topic page tells you who is editing the topic and provides a link to their blog. It also shows who is contributing to the topic and provides a key for the assignments.

You get to these topic pages straight from the Assignment Desk - just look for the orange "topic page" links.


The New and Improved Assignment Zero

David Cohn's picture

Assignment Zero -- now with topic pages.

What this means?

Every topic we are covering has a team that takes charge of their story. Lots of these topics have editors arleady. Joining a team is as easy as clicking a button and once you join, it will be represented in your user page. Join early and join often.

Jay will be chiming in later to write about how these pages can be used to really make Assignment Zero take-off.


Site changes

David has redesign news! Check out the whole new topic page description on his blog. The changes aren't complete, but they are in motion.

As Lauren has said before, the Pro-Am model that we are trying to create is a bit like throwing a party. We made plenty of appetizers and sent out the invitations. In the beginning we were just hoping people would show up.

And they did. Over 900 as of writing this!

Well, we didn't really make a dance floor that big.

We noticed that the site's interface wasn't up to the task and so we've moved some furniture around to make space. We are still in the process of getting those final chairs out of the way.

I can't tell you how excited I am about the team function that we have created. The whole idea of Assignment Zero is that a team of people can do the job of one reporter better than one. We are working on a HUGE story. Together we create one large team. But since we've broken the story down into smaller bits, it's time to break ourselves down into smaller teams -- each focusing on their piece of the pie. I think this will help foster a sense of community along with an effective means to get work done. And while it will create clarity on our work, it will also make the site much easier to navigate. Because if you know what topic you want to tackle, just join the team and the home page for that topic will end up in your bio page -- so you can get back to it quickly every time you log-in.

So our D.J., mix-master Lauren Sandler can turn up the music and now we can really get our groove on.


Ch Ch Ch Changes....

David Cohn's picture

As Lauren has said before, the Pro-Am model that we are trying to create is a bit like throwing a party. We made plenty of appetizers and sent out the invitations. In the beginning we were just hoping people would show up.

And they did. Over 900 as of writing this!

Well, we didn't really make a dance floor that big.

We noticed that the site's interface wasn't up to the task and so we've moved some furniture around to make space. We are still in the process of getting those final chairs out of the way. But here's what we will have for you. Most of these features are in place, some will be getting functionality very soon.

Topic Home Pages

On a topic home page you'll find:

    A list of team members (if you join a team, a link to the homepage will be put in your bio page, so you can access that page again in one click).

    The editor of that topic and a link to their blog

    A discussion thread for that topic so you can talk on site to each other (should be functional soon)

    A "send this page to a friend feature, to help crowdsource your reporting

    A list of "related topics," so you can jump from two topics that are editorially linked (let your editor know if you think two topics should be linked)

    Key Links, which Jay describes as the important back reading that someone should do if they are interested in a topic.

    A way to view ALL reporting that has come in from every assignment, so you can get a bigger picture of what reporting has occured.

And more changes are coming. Soon the Assignment Desk is going to get re-worked too. Give us another day or two.

I can't tell you how excited I am about the team function that we have created. The whole idea of Assignment Zero is that a team of people can do the job of one reporter better than one. We are working on a HUGE story. Together we create one large team. But since we've broken the story down into smaller bits, it's time to break ourselves down into smaller teams -- each focusing on their piece of the pie. I think this will help foster a sense of community along with an effective means to get work done. And while it will create clarity on our work, it will also make the site much easier to navigate. Because if you know what topic you want to tackle, just join the team and the home page for that topic will end up in your bio page -- so you can get back to it quickly every time you log-in.

So our D.J., mix-master Lauren Sandler can turn up the music and now we can really get our groove on.


Syndicate content