Surowiecki - Experts? Not a fix

macirish's picture


Surowiecki's position is that the aggregate decision of a wise crowd will consistently be better than any member - including 'expert' members.

This is not to say that the group can ignore or exclude experts - a group includes everyone.

Citizendium not only is set up to be dependent on experts - it doesn't even appear that it will use the group to select the experts it depends on.

It's plain that the inclusion of experts in the Citizendium process is an attempt to get around a lot of inherent problems in the Wikipedia process - but this decision seems like an attempt to patch a broken process instead of create a new process that would eliminate the source of the problems.


Experts in Citizendum

1ofus's picture

How does what you talk about differ from well established but now quite struggling Encyclopaedia Britannica? Massive undertaking and lots of admin with high costs but highly reliable.

Lilly


Good point

macirish's picture

From what I can tell, the article we're all writing contrasts Citizendium with Wikipedia - maybe we should be contrasting Citizendium with Britannica. Then again, maybe we are.