In researching this topic, I'm reminded of an event that occurred while I was in high school.
In 1997 I remember hearing that our resident Student Resource Officer (SRO), then-Fairfax County Police Officer Jeffrey R. Hand, had been a suspect in at least 2 bank robberies.
It was a shock to me at the time, because the man had spoken to us as students many times in assembly lectures. He was kind of a figurehead, and I'm sure that being an officer amongst high school students, there were many that either respected him or hated him. But no one really thought of him as a criminal.
I attended the high school at which he worked, and I shared one year with my siblings who had started there three years before me. Throughout the course of seven collective years between us, we never thought that since 1995 the man who would be come to known as the local authority--the one who we could go to in absolute dire emergencies that the school authorities could not handle--had deep down inside brewed a corrupted, shameful man, up to his jugular in credit card debt who turned to the most violent of acts to redeem his financial fortitude.
It took a collective task force of the FBI, Secret Service (who deals with conterfeiting and money identification crimes), and local police to bring down Officer Hand's crime-spree.
Thursday, June 10th, 1997 Officer Hand was arrested while coming into work.
During one robbery on Feburary 26th at a local bank on a major crossroad not too far from where I lived, an untimely J. R. Hand fired two shotgun blasts from a Mossberg 500-A shotgun into the doors of a bank that had closed at 2:03 PM when a teller refused to open the doors, breaking them and storming inside.
Ironically, even though it was quoted by one news source that he demanded money from tellers containing no dye-packs, he was caught because he spent marked-money used as bait by the FBI at a local tire shop; a fifty dollar bill.
While mostly unrelated to the concept of crowd-sourcing, it does remind us that once in a while people get corrupt. With the advent of video technology, and media-sharing sites, I'm starting to believe that it should be our public duty as citizens to do whatever we can to root out the corruption of the authority that we place so much faith in, regardless of their importance.
Dirty Politicians, Corrupt Cops, and those who believe that they are impervious from oversight should know this--one day, if not now, certainly down the road, you will be caught and exposed for who you are. The tools are in their infancy, and people are starting to speak.


(^ε^)-☆Chu!!
女子高生との出会い
女子高生最高
女子高生の体
女子高生おっぱい
女子高生のアソコ
女子高生とエッチ
女子高生と割り切り
女子高生の性欲
女子高生ランキング
女子高生検索
女子高生.COM
女子高生.NET
女子高生の妹
女子高生とSEX
女子高生との関係
女子高生専門
女子高生の毛
女子高生と友達
女子高生いっぱい
女子高生紹介所
セフレを探そう
セフレ検査
セフレ発見
セフレ
セフレ秘密
セフレのアソコ
セフレとSEX
セフレ情報
セフレのお仕事
セフレのフェラ
セフレ限定
セフレ大盛り
セフレのスペシャル
セフレの汁
セフレと出会う
セフレに顔射
セフレ日本一
セフレワールド
セフレの悩み
セフレ学園
人妻
人妻
人妻
人妻
人妻
人妻
人妻
人妻
人妻
人妻
人妻
人妻
人妻
人妻
人妻
人妻
人妻
人妻
人妻
人妻
meeting of the minds
hi Robert,
Just caught sight of Jesse's latest blogpost and realized I should connect the two of you -- I think you two have something in common: http://zero.newassignment.net/filed/jesses_huffingonpost_piece_about_dat....
best,
Amanda
My reply
Amanda-
Don't get me wrong, I'm all for recognizing those with common thought, but I have two objections here.
One is that I agree with Jesse about the disgusting exploitation of these individuals who don't necessarily require sympathy but should get some kind of treatment.
Two, I am distraught about DateLine's behavior. Let me clarify:
I believe that those who do wrong should be caught. However, intentionally setting people up in hopes that they'll fall right into the trap that they might have fallen into sooner or later is absurd. This is potentially an act against thoughtcrime.
I was pondering this as I was walking to lunch today--how far will the justice system go? What's the worst that could happen?
I'll tell you what the worst is, and this is it. The idea that we root out people who POTENTIALLY have the tenacity to commit crime is not the same as those who actually commit the crime.
It's a fine line between the fantasizers and the doers, that much may be true. If someone thinks sickly, is it a morally responsible thing to push them to act upon those urges?
There's a very good Twilight Zone episode, "A Penny For Your Thoughts" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Penny_for_Your_Thoughts) starring Dick York as a man who inadvertently gains the ability to read minds. As such, he stumbles upon a devised plot by an old bank employee to walk right out with a fairly large sum of money. When encountered, the man confesses that yes, it is indeed his fantasy but he would never act on it, which brings me to my point.
Sometimes fantasies, regardless of their ill status, are just that. It is morally and ethically reprehensible for a nationally syndicated television program whose sole objective to gain ratings is to push people with vivid fantasies to act them out. For this, I am ashamed of DateLine and their staff, and have lost a fair amount of respect, trust, and belief in their motivations and integrity.
Another reply
Hi Robert and Amanda,
Sorry, coming late to this discussion -- I'm still finding my way around the site. I appreciate Robert's comments here very much, and think his warning is an important one to keep in mind throughout the CLE assignment: it is potentially easy for something like this to become a form of vigilante justice that could have effects beyond those intended. I think it might be a good idea to put Robert's post somewhere clearly visible in the CLE part of the site, as a general caveat.
Thanks to you both.
Jesse Wegman
jesse.newassignment@gmail.com
The amazing thing about
The amazing thing about Jeff' Hand's demise is that it was actually brought about by a good honest cop from the fairfax county police department. Det Lenny Cordick actually investigated and uncovered the robberys and persevered to identify hand.