Discussing What should we ask Jeff Jarvis?

Oyun
Yeni Oyunlar
Bedava Oyunlar
Video
Seks
Haberler
Articles
indirmeden izle
Sıcak Video
Vidyolar
Komik Videolar
izle
Film Seyret
Dizi izle
Sinema izle
Sıcak

Erotik
Bedava Porno Video
erkek pornosu
porno vidiolar
sex
seks
erotik film
türbanli porno
porno film seyret
aydemir akbaş pornosu
yerliporno
sikiş
yatak odasi erotik
türk erotik flim
erotik oyun
gaylar
türk porno
erotik film izle
sibel kekilli
zerrin egeli porno
erotic film izle
müjde ar filmleri
Porno videolar
sex
kızlık bozma
porn tube
sexy woman
sexy bikini
free porn
sex film
gizli çekim
gizli film
gizli
porno fılm ızleme
porno filim
gizli porno
seda sayan sex
hardcode videolar
indirmeden dizi izle

What sort of disclosure practices should crowdsourcing projects implement, to protect against invasion by PR interests?

In citizen journalism projects, particularly where the citizens are collecting and/or writing up unstructured data, the potential for slant exists; so some form of disclosure is essential. But -

Would it be enough if they just mentioned that they're affiliated with Project Y (which lies within the subject area of the reporting), and not say
a) what the nature of the affiliation is (e.g. roughly how much Y is paying)
b) who/what is ultimately funding Y, and what their mission is
?

What would constitute a disclosure that was sufficient for readers to use in judging the credibility of the writing, and (ideally) also sufficient to neutralize any potential PR benefit it could provide?

(hope this is clear; if not, feel free to reword it)

How do Citizen Journalists establish credibility with their audience?

How do citizen journalists, many of whom have little to no formal journalism training, learn to navigate the potentially tricky realms of what constitutes libel, slander, etc? Are citizen journalists held to different legal standards than their professional counterparts? If so, in what ways?